15.08.2020 Nepřesný český rabínský překlad Bible o povinnosti pro nežidy jíst zdechliny

August 15, 2020 An inaccurate Czech rabbinical translation of the Bible about the obligation for not-Jews to eat carrions

Orthodox Jews* are possibly snakes (i.e. human reptile cortex - archicortex). Snakes are possibly Orthodox Jews*. All snakes like.

These snakes would have eaten ideally every human being before death as old and demented.

The world is possibly a snake illusion, but (reincarnated) living creatures are apparently real.

Deuteronomium 14:21 Nesmíte jíst žádnou (bez porážky lidmi, má poznámka) zdechlinu. Buď ji dáš bezdomovci, který žije v tvých branách, aby ji jedl, nebo ji prodáš cizinci. Vždyť jsi svatý lid Hospodina, svého Boha. Nebudeš vařit kůzle v mléce jeho matky. (Český ekumenický překlad) 21 Nebudete jísti žádné (bez košer porážky, má poznámka) zdechliny, cizinci, který jest v branách tvých, můžeš ji dáti jísti nebo prodáš (ji) cizozemci, neboť lid svatý jsi Hospodinu Bohu svému. Nebudeš vařit kůzle v mléce jeho matky. (Sicher - český rabínský překlad) 21 lo tochelu chol-nevela lagger ašer-bišarecha tittennena vaachala o machor lenachri ki am kadoš atta lADONAJ elohecha lo-tevaššel gedi bahhalev immo: f (Bible Hebraica, také Aleppo codex transkripce výslovnosti) 21 Nebudete jíst každou zdechlinu ("nevelu") (k)bydlícímu který v branách (lůně) tvých dáš ji a jedl (či jedla, má poznámka) ji nebo prodal (k)cizinci protože lid svatý ty (k)Jahvemu Bohu tvému nebudeš vařit kůzle (dítě) v mléce matky jeho (či její, má poznámka): f (Můj doslovný překlad: Bible Hebraica, také Aleppo codex)

Zdroje/ Sources: DAVAR3 (zkráceně také D3) je aplikace českého autora určená ke studiu Bible s překlady Bible viz/ DAVAR3 (abbreviated as D3) is an application by a Czech author designed to study the Bible with Bible translations see: https://www.instaluj.cz/davar3 ; Český ekumenický překlad, viz/ Czech ecumenical translation, see: http://www.biblenet.cz/ ; KICUR ŠULCHAN ARUCH, Kniha II, Rabi Šlomo Ganzfried, přeložil: Miriam Havelková, nakladatelství AGADAH s.r.o., Česká republika 2012, kapitola 167, odstavec 8., strana 296/ KITZUR SHULCHAN ARUCH, Book II, Rabbi Shlomo Ganzfried, translated by: Miriam Havelková, publishing house AGADAH s.r.o., Czech Republic 2012, chapter 167, paragraph 8., page 296; Žid Süss - Jud Süss (Lion Feuchtwanger židovský román 1925, Veit Harlan nacistický film 1940)/ Jud Süss - Süss the Jew (Lion Feuchtwanger Jewish novel 1925, Veit Harlan Nazi film 1940); studie dvou neortodoxních židů Theodora Mucha a Karla Pfeifera Svár bratří v domě izraelském Židovstvo mezi fundamentalismem a osvícenstvím, z německého originálu Bruderzwist im Hause Israel přeložila Marie Goldmannová v České republice vydalo nakladatelství THEMIS, Praha 2000, s. 17, 31, 33-34, 102, 113 a 123/ study of two unorthodox Jews Theodor Much and Karel Pfeifer The quarrel of brothers in the house of Israel Judaism between fundamentalism and the Enlightenment, translated from the German original Bruderzwist im Hause Israel by Mary Goldmann in the Czech Republic published by THEMIS, Prague 2000, pp. 17, 31, 33-34, 102, 113 and 123

August 10, 2020 And what about future. Here, the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic has the character of a precedent expressing the binding negative opinion of this constitutional court on the question of the sale of carrions of animals naturally dead on principle in old age in mainstream shops as the present most merciful possible meat. I am too weak to enforce this sale in politics myself in the near future, if I have not a proof of great success on this question. During contemporary worldwide human consumer welfare the enactment of slaughter tax and of this sale in the European Union is probably mere utopia, therefore on the present apparently individual human being can mostly help the most massively tortured and murdered imprisoned farm animals on principle only on own garden (Epicurus' paradise garden) and otherwise too little. Nevertheless, I believe that the enactment of the slaughter tax and of this sale will take place in the future, because even in the present time, which is unfavorable for it, I believe in a sovereign rule of charity (i.e. the least possible death and pain, see my Philosophy of Balance) in the world at least 51 percent.

July 23, 2020 Above mentioned DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT. The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic without the presence of the participants on 23 July, 2020 in the matter of my constitutional complaint File no. III. ÚS 1793/20 decided to reject this my constitutional complaint and the related proposal to repeal the provisions of the Veterinary Act, stating that it is not another intervention of a public authority, although the question of the Market Rules of the municipality is regulated by public law paragraph 18 of Act No. 455/1991 Coll. Trade Licensing Act. According to this decision of the constitutional court „the conclusion of a contract for the lease of a market place in a market operated by a municipality is“ (so allegedly) „a purely private law matter (in the case of a municipality it is done within independent jurisdiction) and none of the potential contracting parties can be forced to enter into a contractual relationship.“ 

Most important, however, is the following opinion of the constitutional court, which has the nature of a binding precedent, which in my opinion is a crime against humanity, because it de facto legitimizes contemporary murders of tens of millions of farm animals for each month also in the territory of the Czech Republic. „In addition,“ according to this decision of the constitutional court „it is for the lessor to determine what goods are to be offered at the market and to determine the conditions for their sale. The rejection of the complainant's application for the lease of a market place justified on the grounds that his intended sale of carrion meat (even fresh and perhaps also with a veterinary certificate) is in conflict with veterinary regulations, compliance with which is required in the Market Rules, represents“ allegedly „a completely legitimate procedure on the part of the town of Hustopeče.“

July 16, 2020 I propose to call "private (i.e. intrastate) international law" as "statutory conflict international law (eg civil or on the contrary criminal etc.)".

And "public (i.e. interstate) international law" as "non-conflict international law (eg civil or on the contrary criminal etc.)".

This would remove the confusion between the concepts of public and private in international law and would predetermine the ultimate goal of world evolution from the statutory conflict international law to the non-conflict international law.

June 30, 2020 Today, my lawyer filed the above-mentioned constitutional complaint with the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic with a proposal on how to resolve animal slavery.

(see also my articles below from May 17, 2020 and from June 12, 2020)

June 12, 2020 I will file a constitutional complaint (see above in the Czech language with google translator) against refusal of the Town of Hustopeče and its market administrator to rent me one market place at market on Dukelské square in Hustopeče for sale in small quantities of unprocessed after veterinary autopsy fresh meat of poultry carrions, namely of chicken (hen) meat from my own small farm (breeding activity), especially to ethical vegetarians who do not survive without eating meat completely.

Alternatively, I will file a constitutional complaint after the lease of the above market place for the above mentioned purpose against a final decision of the Regional Veterinary Administration about its disagreement with the free sale of the above mentioned carrions and on the contrary necessary slaughter under the current Act No. 166/1999 Coll. on veterinary care in the current version due to doubts about compliance with obligations or requirements to ensure their health safety, unless the concerned provisions of the Act are considered unconstitutional.
 
In this constitutional complaint, I propose the repeal of §3 paragraph 1 letter d), §5 paragraph 1 letter h), §18, §21 paragraph 1, §27a paragraph 1 letter b) and §27a paragraph 3, §39 paragraph 2 and paragraph 3, §39 to §41, §42 paragraph 2 the second and third developed sentence objects of the Act No. 166/1999 Coll. on Veterinary Care in the current wording for its unconstitutionality (see below my article from May 17, 2020). In the case of my constitutional complaint against the above mentioned decision of the Regional Veterinary Administration, the justification of this constitutional complaint through the application of the Act No. 166/1999 Coll. will be even more clear.
 
This constitutional complaint is not inadmissible, even if the Constitutional Court came to the conclusion in this case that I did not exhaust all procedural means, because in the sense of §75 letter a) of the Act on the Constitutional Court this constitutional complaint substantially exceeds the complainant's own interests through its significance and will be filed within the period of 1 year prescribed here, because in the case of permitting free sale of meat of carrions under legally guaranteed conditions it would be apparently the turning practical point in the fight against the slavery in present slaughter factory farms of the most murdered farm animals (in the Czech Republic there are, for example, about half a million broilers killed, i.e. chickens of hens per day, which makes in the Czech Republic with about 10 million inhabitants a terrible number of about 30 million murdered broilers in two months , which is a kind of new holocaust, see Sources).

May 17, 2020 (short version) Today I filed an application to rent one market place at market on Dukelské square in Hustopeče for sale in small quantities of unprocessed after veterinary autopsy fresh meat of poultry carrions, namely of chicken (hen) meat from my own small farm (breeding activity), especially to ethical vegetarians who do not survive without eating meat completely

Dear.

(the Town of Hustopeče, the market administrator: Organizational Unit of the Town of Hustopeče Administration and Maintenance of Buildings)

I am a small poultry breeder in my garden with a cellar on Habánská Street in Hustopeče, and I hereby ask about the lease of one market place at the market on Dukelské square in Hustopeče for sale in small quantities of unprocessed after veterinary autopsy fresh meat of poultry carrions, namely of chicken (hen) meat from this own small farm (breeding activity).

Justification:

According to § 18 (5) of Czech Act No. 166/1999 Coll. on veterinary care Foods of animal origin that do not meet the health requirements are considered inedible.

But for the the meat of carrions, if "they are processed thermally for a period of time 5 until 6 minutes at temperature 121°C, there is destruction of vegetative forms of microorganisms, but also of spores." (Source: Secondary Vocational School Domažlice, tutorial material, Food and nutrition, quoted 15.03.2019, see https://www.soudom.cz/maso-a-masne-vyrobky.html ) This is possible by boiling the meat of the by me intended offered poultry carrions after a veterinary autopsy in a pressure cooker, for example in several waters.

Therefore §18 of the Czech Act No. 166/1999 Coll. on veterinary care I consider unconstitutional, because at present time in the Czech Republic these legal conditions basically prevent the free sale of fresh meat of naturally dead animals, on principle for old age even after veterinary autopsy.

I base this opinion on the unconstitutionality of the impossibility of free sale even after a veterinary autopsy, of the meat of naturally dead animals on the current trend in Czech law, which fundamentally changes the view of animal rights in our society.

In particular, it is the CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS: Article 3 (1) Fundamental rights and freedoms are guaranteed to all without distinction ... ("to all", thus they are guaranteed to both people and animals, which have legal personality, see below the Civil Code, my note) and at the same time according to Article 6 (1) Everyone has the right to life.

It is also the Act No. 114/2020 Coll. Act amending Act No. 40/2009 Coll. the Criminal Code, if according to this amendment of the Criminal Code § 302 Cruelty to animals (3) this act causes the permanent health consequences of abused animal or death, the offender will be punished by imprisonment from two years to six years (this criminal act with more severe punishment could also be the unjustified slaughter of an animal, my note), and if according to this amendment of the Criminal Code completely new §302a The breeding of animals in unsuitable conditions  (4) this act causes permanent (health) consequences or death to a larger number of animals, the offender will be punished by imprisonment from five to ten years.

It is also the Act No. 89/2012 Coll. Civil Code.

According to §8 of the Civil Code Manifest abuse of law does not enjoy legal protection. (These are the traditional principles and principles of modern law "neminem laedere" /not to harm anyone/ and the criterion of individual freedom that one's freedom ends where the other's freedom begins, which could also apply to "abusus iuris" (abuse of law) to slaughter an animal, i.e. animal cruelty through their unjustified slaughter, in my opinion it is a tort according to § 2909 of the Civil Code Violation of good morals or § 2910 of the Civil Code Violation of the law /namely of the Criminal Code, see above /, my note).

According to § 494 of the Civil Code A living animal has a special meaning and value as a living creature already gifted by senses. A live animal is not a thing and the provisions on things apply to a living animal similarly only to the extent that it does not contradict its nature. (In my opinion, this provision implies the legal personality of animals, because the animal is not a thing, but has a very limited legal capacity /monkey/ or none /serpent/, and needs custody and representation of human being in the exercise of their duties and rights granted them under Czech law /e.g. see the above provisions of the Criminal Code/, however, it is true that all living creatures should have in our society the rights recognized in righteous way by State laws, my note)

They are also §2 (3) of the Civil Code prohibition of cruelty (also to animals, my note), §3 of the Civil Code (1) a ban on causing unjustified harm to others (ie also to animals, my note), (2) letter A) everyone has the right to the protection of their life and health, letter F) no one can be denied what belongs to them by law (see above the rights of animals according to the Criminal Code, my note), (3) Private law also springs from other generally recognized principles of justice (ie apparently good morals, my note) and law.

According to the operating rules of the market on Dukelské square in Hustopeče, the market administrator reserves the right to assess the sales assortment and, if necessary, to exclude an unsuitable assortment or part of it from sale. It should not be my case.

Because according to Article 2 (3) of the Czech Constitution, the State Power serves all citizens ... (i.e. it serves both me and /Czech/ animals which have legal personality according to Czech law, see the above-mentioned Civil Code, my note)

And because according to the CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS Article 26 (1) Everyone has the right to freely choose a profession and to prepare for it, as well as the right to engage in business and other economic activity. (2) The law may determine conditions and restrictions for activities. (This also applies to my above-mentioned economic activity in Your market, when the above-mentioned legal restrictions should not apply to it due to the unconstitutionality, which I object to, my note)

Attachments: JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., Summary of Philosophy of Balance (4 pages A4), copyleft 14.5.2020

Sincerely

In Hustopeče 17.5.2020 JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.

April 9, 2020 Coronavirus (disease 2019) - COVID 2019

Pope Francis says pandemic can be a ‘place of conversion’
...
Pope Francis: There is an expression in Spanish: “God always forgives, we forgive sometimes, but nature never forgives.” We did not respond to the partial catastrophes. Who now speaks of the fires in Australia, or remembers that 18 months ago a boat could cross the North Pole because the glaciers had all melted? Who speaks now of the floods? I don’t know if these are the revenge of nature, but they are certainly nature’s responses.
...
At this time in Europe when we are beginning to hear populist speeches and witness political decisions of this selective kind it’s all too easy to remember Hitler’s speeches in 1933, which were not so different from some of the speeches of a few European politicians now.

„Uprostřed (čínského) Wu-chanu je laboratoř na výzkum smrtících virů. Laboratoř leží jen 18 kilometrů od trhu, kde se poprvé objevil wuchanský koronavirus. … vývoje biologických zbraní, která tato zařízení také umožňují. … Možnost vstřikovat zde opicím a dalším zvířatům smrtící patogeny“ „Wuchanské úřady navíc na začátku roku tvrdily, že se novým koronavirem mohou nakazit jen osoby, které přišly do styku s infikovanými zvířaty.“ (viz  1. a 3. zdroj) Avšak: „Vědci: Koronavirus (nemoc 2019) - COVID-19 … není z laboratoře“ (viz 2. zdroj).

„Nature (tj. prestižní Západní vědecký časopis, má poznámka) uvádí, že většina vědců v této laboratoři získávala zkušenosti ve francouzském Lyonu, kde mají zařízení na stejné úrovni. Wuchanský ústav také spolupracoval s americkým Centrem pro kontrolu a prevenci nemocí.“

„Česká republika má takové pracoviště v Těchoníně, malé obci v okrese Ústí nad Orlicí, kde ho provozuje armáda.“

March 20, 2020 Coronavirus (disease 2019) - COVID 2019

“In the center of (Chinese) Wuhan is a laboratory for the study of deadly viruses. The laboratory is only 18 kilometers from the market where the Wuhan coronavirus first appeared. … the development of biological weapons that these facilities also allow. … The possibility to inject deadly pathogens into monkeys and other animals” “The Wuhan authorities declared at the beginning of the year moreover that only persons who came into contact with infected animals could be infected with the new coronavirus.” (see source 1 and 3) However: “Scientists: Coronavirus (disease 2019) - COVID-19 … is not from the laboratory” (see source 2). 

“Nature (i.e. a prestigious Western scientific journal, my note) states that majority of the scientists in this laboratory gained experiences in Lyon, France, where they have the same level of equipment. The Wuhan Institute also cooperated with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States of America.”

"The Czech Republic has such a workplace in Těchonín, a small village in the Ústí nad Orlicí district, where it is managed by the army."